![hqplayer crash hqplayer crash](https://tof.cx/images/2018/01/18/abf3687ba17d7e964cf77a3f8d73bb15.png)
windows resampling has never been the best solution. In the end if someone is going to change the sample rate on the computer, it makes sense to at least use a good process to do it. ^_^ plenty or reasons not to know what to do while being absolutely mad paranoid.
HQPLAYER CRASH FULL
If we're going full obsessed, there is also the game about async sample rate conversion used in some DACs. but good DACs deals with that just fine and should be left alone IMO. so basically, the crappier your filter at 44.1, the better is ti to have higher sample rate. at higher sample rate, the filter can start outside the audible range and can be very very gentle and do a proper band limiting job. but then if you use a strong low pass, people go crazy because "hermagerd ringingrrr!!!". but starting high enough in frequency to avoid audible change in the signature at 44.1khz comes at the cost of doing a fairly poor band limiting job(and digital audio exists on the concept of good band limiting so there is that). at 44.1khz a gentle low pass means starting in the audible range and getting audible roll off in the trebles. The most accepted reason seems to be that the low pass filter can be gentler for band limiting, while still keeping low distortion levels. of course I see an amazing irony anytime I think about a guy using a NOS DAC while oversampling his CD tracks, but if I was stuck with a NOS DAC, I'd do just that. an objective one, not just "I like it so it must be better". for those DACs, running away from 44.1khz by any mean is almost always an improvement. even to this day this is still a possibility(mostly because money), and of course NOS DACs are embodiment of wrong in that respect. this machine is stable but some of this stuff is half baked imo.Īll modern DACs convert to analog a signal at sample rates that far exceed 96 or 192khz, for that simple reason, it's usually meaningless to do a small oversampling or upsampling in the computer before sending the signal to those DACs. all of the sudden i cannot get foo_asio to work with jriver either now.
HQPLAYER CRASH SOFTWARE
with a dac that good i would not rely on software upsampling. I also find it is best to let the dac do the upsampling.
![hqplayer crash hqplayer crash](https://roon-community-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/optimized/3X/0/c/0c7238e4c6887e0333fe711086ad08f18b740284_2_690x197.png)
can you make foobar look like a mini player on jriver without 100 plugins? that is probably why jriver and foobar run and hqplayer does not. does xxhighend just run in windows? getting hqplayer to work is also too difficult. i know that sounds stupid with my gear but i don't just throw out money. i like jriver because the functionality is close to roon but i think it sounds better.
HQPLAYER CRASH TRIAL
usually if they even have a trial of these it is badly crippled. hardware at a certain level you obviously go to a dealer and listen first. It is linux or windows? i hate to go buying a bunch of software just to try it out.